Retirement: an age variable geometry
"We will not retire at age 60 as we passed in 1982," Manuel Valls Assen. "Nobody says that," irritated Martine Aubry. Yet behind the totem of 60 years Wednesday by waving the primary contenders, hiding the reality quite different. François Hollande only accepts the retirement at that age for those who already have all their quarters. And he sees this as an intermediate stage before a vast overhaul of the system. Manuel Valls as Jean-Michel Baylet also advocate to review everything but are more specific about their goal: a point system, "as in Sweden," says first, "a la carte," added the second.
This would eliminate the problem of legal age, everyone is free to stop work when he wants, even if just a small pension.Ségolène Royal promises, in turn, "the return to retirement at age 60, without any discount for those who have their useful contribution." Martine Aubry appear on the same line … which is precisely to return to 60 years as 1982, a slight difference: the contribution period required for a full pension will be more than 37.5 years. "When life expectancy increases, we must extend the contribution period," admits François Hollande. Well, this time, a point that is the consensus among the suitors, and who endorse the principle set by the Fillon reform of 2003.Holland and Valls even explicitly mention the term adopted in July by the government (41.5 years for 1955 and subsequent generations) in the jeers of the left.
Occupation: differences in hiring to firing
Martine Aubry does not believe in "contracts of generation" François Hollande (if exemption from the hiring of a youth while maintaining a senior in the workforce). In addition to cost 8 billion a year, it anticipates a "windfall" of companies. Ségolène Royal stigmatizes a new "social niche". As for the jobs of the future of Martine Aubry and Arnaud Montebourg, Manuel Valls speaks of an "ineffective measure" that will not allow young people to enter high quality business cards.While Segolene Royal wants to "put into law a ban on layoffs stock" and those "motivated by profitability alone," Martine Aubry wants to allow unions to "seize the court to appoint an interim administrator." François Hollande, he suggests increasing "financial sanctions" to fight against unfair dismissal.
Education: recruit or not?
The proposed François Hollande to create 60,000 jobs in Education in the five years, approved by Arnaud Montebourg, gives rise to a lively exchange with Martine Aubry. "It costs how much?" Quote the mayor of Lille. "2.5 billion euros," says the member for Corrèze. "I wanted to make sure that François Hollande, after proposing not to repeal the budget of Education, now wanted to increase by 2.5 billion euros," continues Aubry.
This in turn will "upgrade the salaries of teachers," "hire psychologists and doctors." Ségolène Royal has a different, for its part, the cost of hiring intended by Holland: "7 billion over five years since 500 million, they must pay every year and they are cumulative. " The president of Poitou-Charentes said that unions "are aware of the financial and budgetary difficulties of the country, and do not require a commitment as strong as this." It calls for "multi-annual programming as needed."
Medical deserts: the incentive constraint
Two camps are emerging. On the one hand, those who want to force young doctors to practice, at least for a few years in deficit areas: Montebourg, Aubry.On the other, those who believe that it will not work and prefer to stick to incentives: Valls, Baylet, Holland – even if it is ready to ban the facilities in the densest areas in doctors. Royal does not choose between two options, but imagine the "clinics with salaried physicians" in the suburbs or countryside.
ALSO READ:
"Attracting future medical practitioners to the deserts
Recent Comments