This reform is reasonable, fair, progressive and effective. It has three main points: a new age of retirement, taking into account the hardship for the first time in France, and a reconciliation between the public and private sectors. Increase to 62 the legal age of retirement is to hold an age of reason, drawing conclusions from the fact that we live longer. Simply increasing the contribution period was rather unreasonable: we should bring to 47 the contribution period to balance the system. By raising the bar to 62 years in 2018, we will remove the pension deficit at that date and until 2020.Afterwards he will talk again, this is normal.

Amendments will be tabled during the parliamentary debate to improve the consideration of the strain at work. What do they consist?

France is the first country to do so the link between pensions and arduous. In the current state of reform, an employee with a disability rating of 20% will retain the right to retire at age 60. I have long listened to the unions and specialists in this question. We need to look if you can better respond to situations of "arduous delayed effect ', that is to say, the case of employees who have had a very exhausting life, but are not medically verifiable when they are retiring. We are also looking at improving the prevention, because the first response to the hardship is to avoid being exposed.We must go further on this issue and improve the traceability of exposure to proven situations of difficulty. We are also considering the organization of occupational medicine for it plays a more important role in this field.

You're not afraid to create a new gas plant?

We will do everything to avoid it as too complex creates injustice. The common law, it will be 62 in 2018. Devices to keep the retirement age to 60 will be fair and operational. About 700,000 people retiring each year, 100,000 will retain the right to leave at 60 when our reform passed through the devices' hardship 'and' long careers.

Do you lower the threshold of 20% disability rate for the consideration of the hardship?

I think that this threshold is realistic.

And for polypensionnés, what do you do?

40% of employees who liquidate their retirement have contributed to several schemes. It is a question more complex than it seems. Some polypensionnés have interest to be because they have such validate more than four quarters per year. We are looking for greater consistency between pension plans, but we want to look at the issue from both sides: the losers of the current system, but also its winners.

When do you intend to publish these amendments?

Nothing is off but probably in the days following the opening of the debate at the meeting. Besides, by then I continue my consultations with Georges Tron.

Bernard Thibault began to worry that the debate on pensions is overshadowed by these cases. Do you see an attack against you?

No.I welcome the attitude of unions who have not howled with the wolves and do not participate in the hunt for the man I'm costs. Bernard Thibault do regret that the controversy overshadowed the debate on the merits of the reform. I think this results from the Socialist Party will do everything to avoid talking about a subject that divides them: the pensions.

Do you fear the mobilization of Sept. 7?

A significant reform, significant mobilization. But the French know that they live longer, it makes sense to share the extra time between work and retirement.

Are you afraid of being targeted by demonstrators on September 7?

That there are banners in my name or my image, I expect, since the opposition instrumentalist my name to caricature the debate on pensions.

Do you remain Minister of Labour after the pension reform or after the redesign?

I will do what the president wants me to do. But I feel very good in this department where I still have many projects to bear.

Which?

Once the pension law passed, we will undertake consultations on the reform of dependence. With Nora Berra we have made great progress on technical solutions but it is still too early to prejudge the financial terms of this reform. I intend, moreover, to resume with Nadine Morano the issue of inequality between men and women who did not sufficiently advanced, despite the many laws passed during the last fifteen years. I will also work on the topic of workplace violence. I have not forgotten the policy of the city.We need to support experiments in a pool of fifty jobs with Fadela Amara.

"Segolene Royal is poorly placed to give me a moral lesson"

Do you fear one day be referred to the Court of Justice of the Republic about the case Bettencourt?

I am very serene. I have nothing to reproach myself in this case, I am guilty of any conflict of interest and have already had occasion to explain in detail each of the charges which I have been .

Why then the Attorney General of the Court of Appeal considered there this solution?

I have not read that he was considering! He simply, if I understand correctly, responded to a letter which was sent. It examines the issues that are submitted before a decision is his role. I did not comment.However, I can only wonder at the letter sent by Corinne Lepage, who is a political process. I see that right now many are looking to be taking me as a scapegoat. But it's still a shame to receive lessons in morality from someone like her! What was her husband when she was Minister of the Environment? Do not he headed a law firm, specifically in the environment?

You speak of "stoning political" about you. Who are you targeting?

When I hear Ségolène Royal to denounce France 2 20 hours of the "billionaires of the UMP," I say we're living in delirium. The "billionaires UMP" as she says, have given a maximum of 7,500 euros, transparently, under control of the commission of the campaign accounts, in strict compliance with the rules of financing of political life.And at the same time, Ms. Royal is funded by Pierre Bergé. She was sentenced by the court for the conditions under which it has paid two former collaborators, is poorly placed to give me a moral lesson. I have nothing to reproach myself, and I am sure that the judicial process, whatever the judge, will prove it.

Aim to highlight you still not back so weakened that?

It seeks to weaken me! But I do not feel at all weakened. Throughout the summer there has been a little game of trying to prove so-called affairs on my municipal campaign, the sale of land at Compiegne … Every time, everything has deflated half a day. An accumulation of rumors and slander is not a truth. What sites are seeking to do business commercial on my back does not make me guilty.

Your absence from the meeting Brégançon around the head of state, last week, is it not a denial?

The meeting focused on fiscal deficits and budget preparation. I just remember that I am no longer Minister of Budget. Therefore my presence was not normal.

A new request for a hearing she will soon be presented to the Cabinet?

I have no idea. Again, all this, they are rumors spread by some newspapers or sites. I believe in freedom of the press, but I do not believe in freedom to slander.

ALSO READ:

"SPECIAL CASE – The challenges of pension reform

"Woerth ready to receive the unions

Besides GDP, the U.S. will publish the index of consumer sentiment and Chicago PMI. In Europe, German retail sales and GDP of the area will also be published.

Moreover, this last week's meeting will again be marked by a series of major business publications.

Alcatel Lucent revenues of 3.813 billion euros in the second quarter, up 17.4% sequentially and down 2.4% from the second quarter of last year. The group reiterated its outlook for 2010, including an adjusted operating income of between 1% and 5% of its revenues.

JCDecaux announced Friday a net profit in the first half of 65 million euros compared to 4.4 million euros over the same period in 2009. The group anticipates a change in organic revenue for the third quarter less than that of the second with a cash flow of 119 million euros, compared with -1.7 million euros in the first half.

Lafarge reported a sales increase of 2% to 4.43 billion euros in the second quarter. The group now provides a variation of the demand for cement between -1 and +3% in 2010 compared to 2009.Lafarge expects a reduction in capital expenditure to less than 1 billion euros in 2011.

EDF has announced a net profit group share 1.7 billion euros including a provision for $ 1.1 billion on its North American operations easy payday loans. Moreover, the EPR Flamanville, who has two years late, should produce marketable electricity in 2014, with construction costs re-estimated at around five billion euros.

EADS announces first half net profit of 185 million euros and a turnover of 20.3 billion euros. Adjusted operating income is 406 million euros. Its subsidiary Airbus raised its target for gross orders in 2010 to more than 400 aircraft. For Eurocopter, the sales increase for 2010 should exceed 44 billion euros.The adjusted EBIT target is maintained at one billion euros despite negative currency effects that are cumulative outstanding in the first half.

Schneider Electric releases a turnover of 8.57 billion euros in the first half (+10.5%) of which 4.661 billion (+18.5%) in the second. The group expects an increase in organic revenue in the second half "broadly comparable" to that of the first half and is now an EBITA margin of around 15.5% before restructuring costs and the impact of consolidation of distribution areva , against 14% previously.

Renault posted a turnover increase of 23.1% for first half of 2010 to the same perimeter, to 19.668 billion euros.The manufacturer profitable again, the latter standing at 823 million euros over the period cons net loss of 2.712 billion euros a year earlier.

PPR announced a net profit after minority interests rose 86.8% to 407 million euros in the first half. The turnover was 8.139 billion euros, representing organic growth of 1.7%.

Imerys has reported a net operating income rose sharply to 122 million euros (161%) in the first half with a turnover of organic growth of 16%.

Michelin and Total must follow.

LE FIGARO. – Nicolas Sarkozy said Monday he would keep both the tax shield and the ISF. Defend yourself always the opposite?

Jean ARTHUIS. – Yes. I think we should remove the two devices. The shield is a bad answer to a bad tax, the ISF. This shield has too many defects. It is calculated on income tax, not real income. Its beneficiaries are beyond any possible tax increase. This is clearly not fair.

Precisely, the government released the shield fiscal measures to finance the pensions …

Yes, but suddenly the complexity increases. Daring to break the taboos and radically simplify tax by removing the shield and the ISF.To finance this deletion, I propose to create an additional income tax (IR) to 45% and increase the scale of taxation on capital gains and real estate. I will table an amendment during consideration of the budget 2011, in the fall.

This option does not penalized Does not those with high salaries but little fortune?

No. The rate of 45% is a marginal rate, which would apply that beyond 100,000 euros per share. RI takes into account family responsibilities. And there is a 10% reduction on wages. In fact, it is mostly capital gains on shares or real estate, which enrich.

Should we raise taxes?

France can not escape the tax increases. Because the plan proposed by the Government alone will not reduce the public deficit to 3% of GDP in 2013. The growth assumption of 2.5% is unrealistic and inadequate conservation measures.It lacks about 50 billion euros. Besides reducing costs, I propose that VAT in particular the restoration and renovation for housing increased from 5.5% to a rate between 10% and 12%. To restore our competitiveness and combat unemployment, it would even raise without waiting the standard rate of VAT, currently 19.6%. Funding for Medicare and family policy must no longer weigh on earnings. VAT must take over.

At the risk of penalizing low-income households?

Is there any greater injustice than unemployment? By maintaining too high levies on production, is pushed to the relocation. All taxes are ultimately paid by the consumer. For a company that sees its tax increase raises its price. The additional VAT on imported goods will.

Should we cut more in the niches?

Yes.The tax shelters cost 75 billion euros. They are undermining the social compact, by making the tax illegible, unfair and inefficient. In addition, the pricing becomes artificial. Ultimately, we must consider deleting the niches, and especially stop creating new ones. Without the increase of the reduced rate of VAT, the government will have great difficulty in meeting its commitments, that is to say an economy 10 billion in two years. The overall ceiling should be lowered.

The government is strong enough on public spending?

During the hearings the Committee on Finance, I had the impression that some ministers were not always aware of the savings. However, it will be necessary to act with determination.Hack 66 billion in credit assistance amounts to touch on sensitive issues such as individual housing (PLA) or subsidies Réseau Ferré de France (RFF). I would add that it is not easy to force parastatal structures to decrease by 10% of their operating expenses. These organizations, ranging from museums to Météo-France, served as space flight for public expenditure.

Should we freeze the salaries of civil servants?

Despite job cuts, the state's payroll increased from 860 million in 2009. This increase is due to wage concessions and changes of the index. Strict moderation is essential.

As a senator from Mayenne, what do you think the value of blocking the funds that the State grants to local communities? This gel can be leveraged to conduct the review of local public policies.Do we really redo roundabouts standards expensive? Especially, the proliferation of standards must end. Premier promised. Despite this, the agricultural modernization law gives the government a right of limitation on the school lunch menu!

France will she one day a zero deficit?

It must. An overburdened state is in the hands of its creditors and threatens the solidarity between generations. This national independence is at stake.

In the first letter in mid-May, Gerard Bekerman, the president of the Afer, had laid the groundwork.The association would make every effort to try to help savers to recover 92 million that the court had decided to confiscate the former leaders. But to get more (the total damage is estimated at 250 million euros), investors should only engage the battle in court. Collective actions are not allowed in France, considers Afer being unable to lead the fight to them.

Mediation proposed

But a few days ago, in another letter, the president went further Bekerman. It offers a mediation "under the responsibility of an independent and indisputable," which "could lead to a financial proposal" probably by the end of the year. The association will stop there. Each member will have to act individually whether to be better compensated.

These proposals indignant SOS principles Afer.The latter, led by Francis Nocaudie, would love to take Afer leading the fight shoulder and at least the action of members no fax payday loans. It invites Afer to turn against the insurer of the contract, Aviva believes it civilly liable for the actions of former executives of the association, and more solvent than Gerard Andre Le Saux or Mathias. SOS Principles Afer the opportunity to mention the loss of independence of the association vis-à-vis the insurer. In recent weeks, the tone is mounted between Francis Nocaudie and current leaders Afer. The first, after asking the court to postpone the general meeting, expected to require the cancellation. Motive? The poor presentation of the resolutions announced by his association, while those of Afer were well developed.And most importantly, the difficulty for members to give him authority to vote on their behalf. "If the power is valid, it was necessary to mention the zip code of my home, that few members know," he says.

Still in question, the insurer Aviva remains silent. Even if, for the debates which agitate Afer today, a lawyer for life insurance, Mr. Lecoq Vallon not hesitate to resurface an old case appropriately. It is indeed in conflict about a company's old contract, which permitted to invest in stocks during the previous week. An investment to "known price" that proved a boon for investors, and difficult for the insurer. "Many court decisions have sided with the investors who had signed the contract and can not benefit," explains Mr. Nicolas Lecoq Vallon.He estimated that 34 million euros provisioned by Aviva to address disputes are insufficient given the amounts involved in that case.

The Head of State has decided on during a meeting just one hour with Prime Minister François Fillon and Labour Minister, Eric Woerth, in charge of the pension. This choice seems to reflect a message of reform on the horizon is "only" set at 2020, while the government did not exclude at the outset to give purpose to sustain the pension until 2030. But energetic measures will be implemented to ensure that indeed the financial balance before.It will then be possible to consider a further postponement of the age, the hardest doubtless having been made by blowing up the taboo of 60 years.

Tax rate raised to the "easier"

Nicolas Sarkozy has also officiated the form that would take the contribution of the "easier" to reform: a contribution equivalent to 1% additional tax on income for households at the upper end, whose marginal rate is 40 % (about 342,000 tax households affected, reporting more than 69,783 euros per share). The 1% levy will not be entitled to refund under the tax shield if it results in a total tax (income tax + local + tax + social security contributions … TFR) of over 50% of income.In addition, the withholding tax on capital gains from securities sales will be increased, perhaps around 1%.

A source familiar with the matter said last that the rate of salary pension contribution (7.85%) would be raised gradually to all staff to reach gradually the private sector employees (10.55%). In addition, prospective employees may have their pensions calculated on the best 25-year career, instead of six months. These elements were however not confirmed in the late evening.

A bill to be finalized by Friday midnight

These measures, which will be officially unveiled this morning, will now be subject to the unions and employers. The government gave two days to possibly drop a little ground, then he will write the final version of his bill before Friday midnight.The text should indeed be forwarded before the deadline for authorities to be consulted (Councils of the three public, boards of directors of social security funds). Otherwise, the whole of his schedule to be called into question: the text could then be presented to the Cabinet on July 13 and is discussed in committee in the Assembly during the week of July 19, before arriving in the Chamber in September.

ALSO READ:

"Pensions and Parliamentary bosses affected

"Pensions savings could be taxed

"FILE – Retreats: all about reform

But the boss of the International Monetary Fund had especially in mind the "Greek case". "There is no simple solution," he admitted."Everyone can understand that I will not give many details about Greece because we are just beginning to negotiate." Asked about a possible "restructuring of public debt", he replied that "it is not a question on which we work. " The opposite would have been surprising.

Dominique Strauss-Kahn has been more incisive about what should be the main topic of discussion of the G20 Finance Ministers, held on Friday, namely the financial sector reforms."In many areas, such as rating agencies, trading over the counter (derivatives), hedge funds, which has been announced if implemented by the United States, Europeans, Japanese is simply incoherent fast payday loan. "

DSK will strike while the iron is hot and play the full role of coordinator who is the IMF's mandate. "We have a political pressure in most countries, the United States and the European Union to ask governments to move faster.". He took the opportunity to condemn the so called "Basel II on bank capital and the development of which" has taken twelve years.

Two proposed fee

This warning is "advanced countries", the only ones whose banking systems have been failing during the crisis of 2008-2009.It is accompanied by an IMF report, whose first draft will be discussed by finance ministers. DSK summed himself three themes: "The rules of liquidity and capital, systemic risk, and the resolution mechanism (failure)."

The study recommends the introduction of fees. The one on the balance sheets of financial institutions, to supply a mattress of rescue funds. The other tax, sitting on profits and wages, would be to share the burden of public budgets. The IMF, however, rejects the hypothesis of a Tobin tax on financial transactions. It does not contribute to financial stability or to fight against the excessive risks taken.

ALSO READ

The IMF raised its forecast for global growth

"Banking: Crime and punishment

The association, which aims to promote equity between the retirement of private employees and that of other assets (staff, nationals of special schemes …) based on official documents, public or not.It highlights the "extraordinary performance" of the Senate plan: taking into account life expectancy and age of retirement (67.5 years), a senator "means" receive before his death, 4.90 euro pension for every dollar contributed during his career – against 1 euro pension for about an employee's private and 2 for an official.

A former senator who made a single six year term and receives 1 932 euros monthly pension. Either "30% more than the average pension of an employee's private after a full career," observes Backup pensions. Only condition, almost always true: have paid double, as any senator has the opportunity during his first fifteen years in the "house" (480 euro premium "pay" per month). Reversion (retired widower and widow elected) is more favorable than in the general scheme.Finally, "most varnishes are the senators from the public (39% of the Chamber)," wrote Saving pensions. They can continue to contribute 7.85% of wages they would have received in their original, adding the State as 60.14% for all staff. Finally, they combined so full of retired staff and retired Senator, unlimited.

And yet, despite this apparent generosity, the body of senators shows no deficit, despite his bad demographic situation: 1.7 to 1 pensioner contributor (cons 1 retiree for 1.4 active in the general scheme). By what miracle? Strong support from taxpayers? Not really: the contribution "employer" paid by the Senate, represents 2.4 times the premium "pay" for senators.This is more than in the private but much less than in the public or any other special arrangements (for members, taxpayers pay 7 times more than the elected themselves!).

Everything comes from the fact, that the backup pension scheme senators is "remarkably managed. Based on the collective capitalization (1), he leads every three years an audit in which it updates its forecasts and issue invitations to tender to select managers for its funds. Sewing up since birth … in 1905, he held a "pot" whose composition is unknown but the end of 2008 amounted to 575 million euros – given the financial crisis, a provision impairment has been moved cautiously, however, reducing the carrying value of these reserves to 484 million.Result: only the interest generated by these investments provide over half of the pensions paid each year.

A pool of 1 billion euros in 2050

A performance such as – and this is the only criticism Backup pensions – by "employer" is "not only immoral but unnecessary. Why bother keeping a grant which only swell the reserves that increase perceptibly from year to year? ". Calculations of the association, placed at a reasonable rate of 4%, this kitty will reach 1 billion euros in 2050 …

(1) Safeguarding pensions do not hide that she is campaigning for the introduction of a dose of capitalization in the general scheme, which currently relies on distribution, Ed.

"DOCUMENT – The study Backup Pensions (pdf)

However, through the last two months, rather bearish, suggesting that the destocking process finds no link with a recovery in demand.In addition, manufacturing output last three months is 10.4% lower production in the same month last year, which is hardly pleasing. "The truth is that no demand: our exports, especially to our neighbors in the European Union, are crumbling and the investment in the country continues to decline" Analysis and Alexander Law.

The situation in the automotive sector and is symptomatic. Despite a sharp increase in registrations due to the scrapping bonus, production slowed significantly in September in October, with a 5% drop in production in October, itself resulting from a fall of 8.1% in September. After a period of destocking, manufacturers are reluctant to turn back to their full production lines, especially with the planned termination of premiums.