What are the main principles of pension reform that will defend from 7 September to the National Assembly?

This reform is reasonable, fair, progressive and effective. It has three main points: a new age of retirement, taking into account the hardship for the first time in France, and a reconciliation between the public and private sectors. Increase to 62 the legal age of retirement is to hold an age of reason, drawing conclusions from the fact that we live longer. Simply increasing the contribution period was rather unreasonable: we should bring to 47 the contribution period to balance the system. By raising the bar to 62 years in 2018, we will remove the pension deficit at that date and until 2020.Afterwards he will talk again, this is normal.

Amendments will be tabled during the parliamentary debate to improve the consideration of the strain at work. What do they consist?

France is the first country to do so the link between pensions and arduous. In the current state of reform, an employee with a disability rating of 20% will retain the right to retire at age 60. I have long listened to the unions and specialists in this question. We need to look if you can better respond to situations of "arduous delayed effect ', that is to say, the case of employees who have had a very exhausting life, but are not medically verifiable when they are retiring. We are also looking at improving the prevention, because the first response to the hardship is to avoid being exposed.We must go further on this issue and improve the traceability of exposure to proven situations of difficulty. We are also considering the organization of occupational medicine for it plays a more important role in this field.

You're not afraid to create a new gas plant?

We will do everything to avoid it as too complex creates injustice. The common law, it will be 62 in 2018. Devices to keep the retirement age to 60 will be fair and operational. About 700,000 people retiring each year, 100,000 will retain the right to leave at 60 when our reform passed through the devices' hardship 'and' long careers.

Do you lower the threshold of 20% disability rate for the consideration of the hardship?

I think that this threshold is realistic.

And for polypensionnés, what do you do?

40% of employees who liquidate their retirement have contributed to several schemes. It is a question more complex than it seems. Some polypensionnés have interest to be because they have such validate more than four quarters per year. We are looking for greater consistency between pension plans, but we want to look at the issue from both sides: the losers of the current system, but also its winners.

When do you intend to publish these amendments?

Nothing is off but probably in the days following the opening of the debate at the meeting. Besides, by then I continue my consultations with Georges Tron.

Bernard Thibault began to worry that the debate on pensions is overshadowed by these cases. Do you see an attack against you?

No.I welcome the attitude of unions who have not howled with the wolves and do not participate in the hunt for the man I'm costs. Bernard Thibault do regret that the controversy overshadowed the debate on the merits of the reform. I think this results from the Socialist Party will do everything to avoid talking about a subject that divides them: the pensions.

Do you fear the mobilization of Sept. 7?

A significant reform, significant mobilization. But the French know that they live longer, it makes sense to share the extra time between work and retirement.

Are you afraid of being targeted by demonstrators on September 7?

That there are banners in my name or my image, I expect, since the opposition instrumentalist my name to caricature the debate on pensions.

Do you remain Minister of Labour after the pension reform or after the redesign?

I will do what the president wants me to do. But I feel very good in this department where I still have many projects to bear.

Which?

Once the pension law passed, we will undertake consultations on the reform of dependence. With Nora Berra we have made great progress on technical solutions but it is still too early to prejudge the financial terms of this reform. I intend, moreover, to resume with Nadine Morano the issue of inequality between men and women who did not sufficiently advanced, despite the many laws passed during the last fifteen years. I will also work on the topic of workplace violence. I have not forgotten the policy of the city.We need to support experiments in a pool of fifty jobs with Fadela Amara.

"Segolene Royal is poorly placed to give me a moral lesson"

Do you fear one day be referred to the Court of Justice of the Republic about the case Bettencourt?

I am very serene. I have nothing to reproach myself in this case, I am guilty of any conflict of interest and have already had occasion to explain in detail each of the charges which I have been .

Why then the Attorney General of the Court of Appeal considered there this solution?

I have not read that he was considering! He simply, if I understand correctly, responded to a letter which was sent. It examines the issues that are submitted before a decision is his role. I did not comment.However, I can only wonder at the letter sent by Corinne Lepage, who is a political process. I see that right now many are looking to be taking me as a scapegoat. But it's still a shame to receive lessons in morality from someone like her! What was her husband when she was Minister of the Environment? Do not he headed a law firm, specifically in the environment?

You speak of "stoning political" about you. Who are you targeting?

When I hear Ségolène Royal to denounce France 2 20 hours of the "billionaires of the UMP," I say we're living in delirium. The "billionaires UMP" as she says, have given a maximum of 7,500 euros, transparently, under control of the commission of the campaign accounts, in strict compliance with the rules of financing of political life.And at the same time, Ms. Royal is funded by Pierre Bergé. She was sentenced by the court for the conditions under which it has paid two former collaborators, is poorly placed to give me a moral lesson. I have nothing to reproach myself, and I am sure that the judicial process, whatever the judge, will prove it.

Aim to highlight you still not back so weakened that?

It seeks to weaken me! But I do not feel at all weakened. Throughout the summer there has been a little game of trying to prove so-called affairs on my municipal campaign, the sale of land at Compiegne … Every time, everything has deflated half a day. An accumulation of rumors and slander is not a truth. What sites are seeking to do business commercial on my back does not make me guilty.

Your absence from the meeting Brégançon around the head of state, last week, is it not a denial?

The meeting focused on fiscal deficits and budget preparation. I just remember that I am no longer Minister of Budget. Therefore my presence was not normal.

A new request for a hearing she will soon be presented to the Cabinet?

I have no idea. Again, all this, they are rumors spread by some newspapers or sites. I believe in freedom of the press, but I do not believe in freedom to slander.

ALSO READ:

"SPECIAL CASE – The challenges of pension reform

"Woerth ready to receive the unions